12/30/25

25117 人形機器人採輪式 AMR 與雙足的比較

 輪式 AMR 人形機器人(wheel-based humanoid,如 Vortex、MobED 變體)在平坦/結構化環境效率遠勝雙足設計(bipedal,如 Figure 01、Unitree G1),但雙足在越野與人類互動更靈活。pubs2.ascee+2

技術比較表

維度輪式 AMR 人形雙足人形
速度/效率平地 >20km/h,能量效率高3-5倍,續航長(4+小時)sciencedirect+1<6km/h,高能耗(續航<2小時),行走需持續平衡計算arxiv+1
穩定性/載重寬基底,載重穩定(>50kg),少跌倒arxiv窄支撐面,載重易傾斜,跌倒率高10xhybrid-robotics.berkeley
地形適應平坦/輕微坡度優,門檻<10cm,越野弱sciencedirect極端地形強(階梯/碎石),但慢/耗能humanoidroboticstechnology+1
成本/複雜度低(無膝踝伺服),量產易,$10k-50kpubs2.ascee高(20+DOF扭矩控制),$100k+softwareplanetgroup
操作靈活臂操作佳,室內導航精準(SLAM)sciencedirect全姿態模擬人類,狹窄/互動強acm

輪式 AMR 人形優勢

輪基底結合上身雙臂解決雙足痛點,適合80%商用場域。

  • 工業物流/倉儲:速度快、無疲勞,取代叉車人力(如 Youibot 輪人形變體)。arxiv

  • 穩定任務:巡檢/交付,姿態控制優(如離心輪 MobED)。sciencedirect

雙足人形優勢

模擬人類移動,適用非結構環境。

  • 家庭/醫療:上階梯/坐姿自然,互動親和(如介護)。takanishi.mech.waseda

  • 研究前沿:具身AI學習,未來泛化強。arxiv

輪混合(如 Whleaper 可切換)為折衷主流,預計2026工業主導。pubs2.ascee+1

  1. https://pubs2.ascee.org/index.php/IJRCS/article/view/1107
  2. https://arxiv.org/html/2504.21767v1
  3. https://www.reddit.com/r/IsaacArthur/comments/12d8b5l/what_benefits_do_legged_robots_have_over_wheeled/
  4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0019057825000503
  5. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0094114X25002149
  6. https://arxiv.org/html/2404.17070v5
  7. https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1107799?doi=10.1126%2Fscience.1107799&adobe_mc=MCMID%3D43100226024084064855996130797726807793%7CMCORGID%3D242B6472541199F70A4C98A6%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1636675200
  8. https://hybrid-robotics.berkeley.edu/publications/IROS2022_AdaptingRMA_Biped.pdf
  9. https://humanoidroboticstechnology.com/articles/legged-robot-basics-introduction/
  10. https://softwareplanetgroup.co.uk/the-state-of-the-humanoid-robotics-industry/
  11. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3702468.3702472
  12. http://www.takanishi.mech.waseda.ac.jp/top/research/wabian/index_j.htm